| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
20923
   |
Posted - 2015.04.01 21:58:12 -
[1] - Quote
I like it, but ill reserve my excitement until the devblog after april 2nd proves certain things aren't jokes.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
20925
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 22:39:55 -
[2] - Quote
You'd think CCP would change the Damage Control icon to something that would make miners and industrialists want to fit them....
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
20929
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 23:45:58 -
[3] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:Now if only it was finally a passive module.
The DCU is far too powerful to be made into a passive module without massive nerfs to its effectiveness.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
20930
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 23:59:35 -
[4] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:The DCU is far too powerful to be made into a passive module without massive nerfs to its effectiveness. Especially considering that the introduction of Transverse Bulkheads made hull-tanking a viable tactic, any mod that gives that much resistance bonus across the board should never be passive.
Exactly. to be made passive, it would need to be brought down to 20% (or less, id be ok with 15%) across the board, and still be limited to 1 Damage control module per hull.
But then again, the kind of people wanting to make it passive probably want to retain the 60% resists, as well as make it add +20% to cargo hold volume and +15% to mining yield...
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
20938
|
Posted - 2015.04.02 01:10:01 -
[5] - Quote
Eve Solecist wrote:Ned Thomas wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:You'd think CCP would change the Damage Control icon to something that would make miners and industrialists want to fit them....
So make it look like a mining laser upgrade? No, the YouTube logo. ^_^
Dear god no. Imagine the amount of threads GD would have when 5000 miners complain that youtube doesn't work when the module is activated.. not to mention the support tickets..
..and then id be forced to troll the threads, probably saying something like "looks like CCP needs to change the youtube module name to the boohoo module.." and then the ISDs would have to lock them all and then th... you know what, I need to stop right there because im actually talking myself into wanting it to be the youtube symbol.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|
| |
|